Maria used to love her job.
She joined the support team at a fast-growing SaaS company two years ago, excited to help people solve problems. She was good at it—empathetic, patient, genuinely invested in making customers happy.
Today, she starts every Sunday dreading Monday. She cries in her car after particularly rough shifts. She's applied to three other jobs this week, none of them in customer service.
Her story isn't unique. It's the rule.
If you manage a support team, you probably know someone like Maria. Maybe you've been Maria. The question isn't whether your team is struggling—it's whether you're going to do something about it before they leave.
The Numbers No One Wants to Talk About
Let's get the uncomfortable part out of the way.
Read that again. Nearly half of your support team will quit this year. Not because they found better salaries somewhere else. Because they're exhausted.
The data gets worse:
74% of contact center agents report having experienced burnout. And 59% are currently considered "at risk" of burning out right now. Not someday. Right now. (Source: Hivedesk, Convoso 2024)
The average support agent lasts 13-15 months before leaving. That's barely enough time to fully train them, let alone benefit from their experience.
And here's what keeps me up at night: most companies treat this as a hiring problem. Just recruit more people. Run more job ads. Offer a signing bonus.
It's not a hiring problem. It's a system problem. And you can't hire your way out of a broken system.
It's Not Them. It's the Job.
Here's what I've learned from talking to hundreds of support professionals: the people burning out aren't weak. They're not "bad fits." They're humans trapped in an inhuman job.
Let me show you what their day actually looks like.
“"I feel like a punching bag. Customers scream at me for problems I didn't cause. Then I close that ticket and get another one asking the same question I've answered 40 times this week. Rinse and repeat for 8 hours. Every day."
Reddit User·r/customerservice
Sound dramatic? It's not. Studies show that up to 80% of support tickets are repetitive questions. Password resets. Order tracking. "Where's my refund?" "How do I cancel?"
These questions have answers. Clear, documented, easy answers. But the tickets keep coming. And humans keep answering them. Over and over and over.
“"The anxiety starts Sunday night. I can feel it building. By Monday morning, I'm dreading opening my inbox. The worst part? I used to genuinely love helping people. Now I just feel empty."
Support Team Lead
This is what happens when you take capable, empathetic humans and trap them in a role that offers:
- Endless repetition — The same questions, hundreds of times a week
- Constant criticism — Being the target for customer frustration they didn't cause
- Impossible metrics — Pressure to close more tickets faster, always faster
- Zero recognition — Support is a "cost center," remember? Not a value driver.
- No growth — Answering ticket #10,000 teaches you nothing new
The Cost of Pretending This Is Normal
Here's where this becomes a business problem, not just a human one.
True Cost of Support Agent Turnover
For a 100-person support team with 40% turnover, that's $400,000-$800,000 per year just to stay at the same headcount. You're not investing in growth. You're running in place.
But the hidden costs are worse:
- CSAT tanks when you have a team of mostly new agents
- Resolution times spike because rookies take longer
- Institutional knowledge disappears every time someone leaves
- The remaining team burns out faster picking up slack
It's a death spiral. The more people leave, the harder it is for everyone else, which makes more people leave.
Why "Just Hire More People" Doesn't Work
When executives see support burnout, the instinct is simple: hire more agents. Spread the load.
It sounds logical. It doesn't work. Here's why:
What Hiring More Fixes
- Short-term ticket volume overflow
- Coverage gaps during peak hours
- That's... pretty much it
What Hiring More Can't Fix
- Tickets that are boring and repetitive
- Lack of meaning in the work
- Emotional toll of angry customers
- Metrics pressure that never stops
- Systemic issues that burn people out
If the work itself is soul-crushing, adding more souls to crush doesn't solve anything. You're just scaling the problem.
The same applies to those "wellness initiatives" companies love to announce. Yoga classes. Meditation apps. Mental health days.
Asking an overwhelmed agent to "manage their stress better" while keeping them in the conditions that cause the stress is like offering a Band-Aid to someone standing in traffic.
The issue isn't that your agents can't handle stress. The issue is that the job creates unsustainable stress in the first place.
What If the Job Itself Changed?
Here's where I have to be careful. Because I run an AI company, and the last thing I want is for this to sound like "AI will replace your support team."
That's not what I'm saying. At all.
What I'm saying is: what if AI handled the soul-crushing parts so humans could do the work they actually signed up for?
Think about it. Remember Maria from the beginning? She joined support because she wanted to help people. She liked solving problems. She liked those moments when a frustrated customer became a grateful one.
She didn't sign up to answer "Where's my order?" for the 47th time today.
“The goal isn't to replace support agents with AI. It's to turn support agents back into the experts and problem-solvers they were hired to be.
This is the shift we're seeing with companies that deploy AI thoughtfully:
Before AI Handles Repetitive Work
- Agent answers 80+ tickets/day
- 80% are repetitive questions
- Every ticket feels the same
- No time for complex problems
- Metrics: speed over quality
- Job feels meaningless
After AI Handles Repetitive Work
- Agent handles 20-30 tickets/day
- All are genuinely complex cases
- Each ticket is different
- Time to dig deep and solve
- Metrics: resolution quality
- Job feels like expertise
What Agents Actually Do When AI Takes the Grunt Work
I've watched this happen at companies using Quivr. When AI handles the repetitive tickets—the "Where's my order?" and "How do I reset my password?"—the job changes.
Agents become consultants.
Instead of rushing through ticket after ticket, they have time to actually understand the complex problems. They can research. They can ask follow-up questions. They can turn a frustrated customer into a loyal advocate.
One support lead told me:
“"My team went from dreading work to competing for the interesting tickets. One agent spent 45 minutes on a single customer's integration issue—and actually fixed it. Before, she never would've had the time. Now she's our resident expert on that topic."
Head of Support, E-commerce Company
The work became meaningful again.
- Fewer tickets, but higher impact
- Complex problems that require human judgment
- Customers who are grateful, not just processed
- Time to actually learn and grow
This isn't about reducing headcount. The companies seeing the best results are keeping their teams and redirecting them to higher-value work: building relationships with VIP customers, identifying product issues, creating knowledge base content, training the AI to be even better.
Starting Small: A Pilot That Won't Backfire
If you're reading this thinking "this sounds great but I'm not ready to overhaul my support operation," I get it. Here's how to test the waters without risk:
- 1Identify your top 5 repetitive ticketsPull your data. What questions come up over and over? Password resets? Order tracking? Return policies? These are your AI candidates.
- 2Start with drafts, not auto-sendDeploy AI to draft responses to these tickets, but have agents review before sending. This builds trust and catches edge cases.
- 3Measure agent sentiment, not just metricsAsk your team: Is the work better? Do they feel less overwhelmed? Are they dealing with more interesting problems? This matters as much as ticket volume.
- 4Graduate to auto-resolution on the easy stuffOnce confidence is high, let AI resolve the truly simple tickets automatically. Free your humans for everything else.
Give it one month. If your team isn't noticeably less stressed and your ticket quality hasn't improved, you've learned something valuable. But I've seen this work enough times to bet you'll see the difference.
This Is About Your People
Let me be real for a second.
The support industry has a people problem disguised as a hiring problem. We've accepted 40% turnover as normal. We've accepted burnout as inevitable. We've accepted that support agents are replaceable parts in a machine.
They're not.
The best support professionals I've met are some of the most empathetic, patient, and resilient people anywhere. They deserve better than being worn down by work that a well-trained AI can handle in seconds.
“When we talk about AI in support, the conversation is always about cost savings and efficiency. What if we talked about it as a way to save the humans?
Maria from the beginning of this article? In another timeline, where AI handles the repetitive tickets and she gets to focus on the complex, interesting problems—she's still on that team. She likes her job again. She's the person others come to when things get tricky.
That timeline is possible. We just have to build it.
What Now?
If you manage a support team, here's my challenge to you:
Go talk to your agents this week. Not about metrics. About how they're doing. Really doing.
Ask them what tickets they dread. Ask them what makes them want to quit. Ask them what they'd do if they had more time.
Then ask yourself: What would it take to give them that?
Want to See What This Looks Like?
We can show you how Quivr handles the repetitive tickets in your actual helpdesk. 30-minute call, no pressure.
Book a CallYour support team is burning out. They don't need yoga classes or pizza parties. They need the crushing, repetitive, soul-draining part of their job to go away.
AI can do that.
The question is whether you'll let it.
If this resonated with you—especially if you're a support agent reading this—I'd love to hear your story. Email me at [email protected]. I read everything.
Further reading: Why we're betting everything on proactive AI and How we achieve 99% auto-send accuracy.



%2Fcover.png&w=3840&q=75)